The blog post headline analyzer will score your overall headline quality and rate its ability to result in social shares, increased traffic, and SEO value.Test every headline before you publish. Try the Headline Analyzer »
Have you ever wondered where the best place to put social media buttons on your blog is?
If so, you’re not alone.
Back when we first added social sharing analytics to CoSchedule over a year ago, I wondered the same thing. There are so many small tweaks that you can make to your blog layout that’ll improve conversions and reader experience. Surely, I thought, there has to be a set of best practices for social media buttons as well.
I set out to find all the data on which best influences social sharing on our blog. What I found may actually surprise you. Are you ready to see how you can improve social media sharing on your on blog? If so, read on!
This is a common question, and the answer is a bit more complicated than it might seem at first.
In 2016, social media is as important as ever. However, there is still some debate whether or not social media buttons drive clicks. Part of the reason for that discussion likely derives from how many blogs and sites implement social media buttons ineffectively. It’s not entirely fair to judge a design decision that isn’t set up for success, but we also don’t want to make decisions that can’t be supported by accurate data.
That’s why it’s important to make sure you get the design and placement of your buttons correct. It’s not enough that your buttons simply look good, or that they are just present somewhere on your pages. They need to be placed where they’re going to catch your readers attention and make it easy to share your awesome content with their followers.
By now, you’ve probably gathered that there’s a lot of chatter about this topic. A quick Google search reveals this discussion at Stack Exchange, which considers whether social media buttons should be placed at the beginning or end of a blog post. Despite all of the discussion, there is little evidence to back those ideas up. Even this conversation over at Moz.com fails to provide solid evidence on the subject.
It seems like we may be just guessing. Can’t we do better than that?
To start digging, I looked at what some of the most common options are. I started with the question, “Where do some of the biggest sites on the web place their social media buttons?”
Left of post – Placing social buttons to the left of the blog post makes a lot of sense, as readers follow text left to right. This is the placement that we use here at CoSchedule.
Right of post – This one surprised me, but it is out there. Social Media Examiner is a good example of a site with this placement.
Bottom of post – Placing social media buttons at the bottom of the post was very common, and the only place you will find social buttons on Seth Godin’s blog. Is he missing out on possible shares because of this placement?
In-line of post – A growing trend is to actually place shareable content inline with the rest of your content. We do this regularly on our blog using our Click To Tweet plugin.
No social buttons at all – This is a surprising and growing trend heralded by sites like the Signal v. Noise blog by Basecamp. Are they hurting their chances for viral success? We’ll look into this in a minute, but for now, that’s the playing field.
The question still lingers—where do these sharing buttons perform the best? The answer is, admittedly, a bit hard to find (which may be why so many sites place them so seemingly haphazardly) but there are certainly some big data points that we can examine to reach a conclusion.
Popular social sharing tool AddThis provides some excellent insight on this topic. Their advice to users is as follows:
From these tips, we can easily conclude that prominence matters more than placement when it comes to social media buttons.
With the wrong placement, readers can easily mistake social buttons as ads or other navigation. This will likely result in lower usage for the buttons. Reading through the lines, we can also see that AddThis advocates keeping social media buttons near the top-left side of the page—a conclusion that is supported by other sources.
According to usability icon Jacob Nielson and a study that he conducted in 2006, eyetracking visualizations show that users often read Web pages in an F-shaped pattern: two horizontal stripes followed by a vertical stripe.
The top left portion is the most-viewed part of the web page. More eyes go there than anywhere else. This supports the idea that left and top are best choices for social share buttons, as indicated by AddThis.
Doug Antkowiak makes a great point about social media buttons on the Search Engine Journal blog. He points out that too many social buttons may negatively impact the speed of your website. This is a big red flag, as site speed has been clearly linked to better readership and SEO performance.
The most valuable conclusion that we can draw from this is that we should limit the number of social media buttons that we display to as few as possible. The risks of slowing down our site just isn’t worth it. Social media buttons provide one of those situations where more is not necessarily better.
The data here continues:
After polling 50 of the most popular websites in the world, Webaholic.co.in found that Facebook and Twitter were easily the most-used social media buttons on the web with Linkedin and Google+ also showing strong results. They concluded that the utility of each of those networks fluctuated quite a bit depending on the audience type for each site.
This evidence is backed up by TrackMaven’s more polarizing conclusion after examining nearly 2 billion social shares.
Their data concluded that the vast majority of social shares take place on the top two social networks (Twitter and Facebook).
Clearly, we don’t need to include all networks to make a good use of social media buttons. In this report, TrackMaven reveals that 38.6% of social shares were on Twitter. Facebook “likes” and “shares” accommodated for another 60.3%.
Social proof is a psychological phenomenon where people use the actions of others to guide their own behavior. In essence, it’s the psychological term for “monkey see monkey do.” As one of our own writers, Julie once pointed out:
“Social proof is a shortcut in the thought process. We don’t have to think. The others already did (we assume).”
The reality is that social proof plays a big role in social sharing and can make a big impact on the success of social media buttons.
In a now classic A/B test, Taloon.com (a Finland-based hardware eCommerce store) found that social media buttons were actually hurting their conversion rates.
When they removed the social media buttons from their page, they recorded an 11.9% increase in CTA clickthroughs as compared to the original page. If the results surprise you, you can read more here, but social proof gives us a clear answer for this result.
Because very few people actually “like” product pages, the near zero results on social media buttons were actually providing negative social proof—preventing users from purchasing what they were perceiving as an unpopular product. As Chris Coyer points out on his CSS-Tricks blog, “low numbers can look embarrassing.”
In one of the more complete (but not scientific) studies on the value of social sharing buttons, blogger Joshua Benton concludes that many news organizations receive 20% of their Twitter traffic from Tweet buttons available on their page. That’s actually a pretty big deal!
For example, 16.3 percent of tweets to the New York Times in his tests actually came from a Twitter social media button on the site itself. For the Wall Street Journal, the share rate was more like 20.2 percent. Not bad, huh? Social media buttons can help traffic after all.
One point to keep in mind, however, is that Twitter recently removed the ability for social sharing buttons to display their sharing stats for that platform. So, while the presence of a button to tweet an article may help boost shares, publishers have lost the benefit of positive social proof that comes from having a stat counter.
That makes it tougher to see how many times your posts are getting tweeted, but if you have some technical skills, Google has a partial solution using Google Analytics. It won’t let you display within your social sharing widget how may times a post was shared on Twitter, but it can at least help you know for yourself if readers are clicking your Twitter button.
Despite the results from the New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, not all publications have seen the same success.
UK blog Inside GOV.UK reported a paltry 0.2% increase in shares after adding social media buttons to their site. While buttons being placed at the bottom of the page couldn’t have helped, their results are in line with conclusions developed by Luke Wroblewski, who felt that only 0.25% of Tweets were actually attributable to a social media button after analyzing more than 18 million page views.
Others, like Signal v. Noise just prefer the way their site looks and loads without them and believes that if someone wants to share their content, they will find a way. To each their own, of course, but there is definitely some truth in the matter.
Just a quick survey around the office concludes that most social sharing takes place outside of the article itself, and can be attributed to a variety of other tools. A few examples of this include:
The opinions about social sharing buttons are wide, but often not particularly deep.
Reality is, that it just depends on your own blog and audience type. But, being the adventurous sort that I am, I think that we can easily answer this question (at least to find what’s true in most cases). And the winner is…
Because most websites load content on the left side of the page, and based on how people typically look through a site, it’s easy to see that the most noticeable place for this type of activity is in the top-left portion of the page. This requires a few follow up points:
We’re sure you have some thoughts of your own on this topic, and we’d love to hear them. Sound off in the comments below.
January 25, 2016
Plan content and automate publishing to save tons of time now.
Start your 14-day trial to get organized with CoSchedule today.